Paul DeCamp, Member of the Firm in the Employment, Labor & Workforce Management practice, in the firm’s Washington, DC, office, was quoted in Law360 Employment Authority, in “Injunctions Key Tool in W&H Fights, Birthright Case Illuminates,” by Daniela Porat. (Read the full version – subscription required.)

Following is an excerpt:

Nationwide injunctions could be on the chopping block at the U.S. Supreme Court over President Donald Trump's birthright citizenship order, sparking debate over the role they play in wage and hour law by curtailing regulatory overreach and helping employers operate with predictable compliance obligations, attorneys say. …

Paul DeCamp, a former administrator in the DOL's Wage and Hour Division under George W. Bush and a member of management-side firm Epstein Becker Green PC, said injunctions are a useful device when dealing with upcoming regulations that alter how businesses pay their workers.

"The role that injunctions can play is to provide an avenue for the courts to weigh in on the validity of a rule before it becomes effective," he said. "Employers, if they're going to change their practices, they change them only once, or they don't change them at all, rather than having to make multiple changes."

The timeline from a final rule being issued to when it becomes effective is fairly short, DeCamp said. And oftentimes there is not enough time for a case to proceed to a final judgment before a rule's effective date.

"The role that injunctions play is to have the court issue a preview of its final ruling in effect, and to give the parties guidance based on a less than complete analysis of the issues," he said. "But one that does take into consideration the same types of arguments that the parties will ultimately make at the summary judgment stage." …

DeCamp said that nationwide injunctions will remain a viable path for relief in wage and hour cases —otherwise that would spell chaos for employers and workers.

"I do think that the future of nationwide injunctions is very much in play, given the issues currently before the Supreme Court," he said. "We're certainly watching closely how the court tries to thread the needle."

Jump to Page

Privacy Preference Center

When you visit any website, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. This information might be about you, your preferences or your device and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to. The information does not usually directly identify you, but it can give you a more personalized web experience. Because we respect your right to privacy, you can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings. However, blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable information.

Performance Cookies

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance.

OSZAR »